Add us to your safe senders list to ensure you receive our emails

Problems viewing this email? view it online
Employment Law Bulletin
   QUICK LINKS  NEWS  |  CASENOTES   |  POLICIES AND DOCUMENTS  |  FAQs  |   BLOG   |   MORE
  THE EDITOR'S MESSAGE Issue 869  
  TAILORED DISABILITY REASONABLE ADJUSTMENT AGREEMENT
Joanna Stubbs, Editor

Employers are under a duty to make reasonable adjustments where a workplace practice or any physical feature of the premises places a disabled person at a substantial disadvantage. With this duty in mind, we have added a model tailored reasonable adjustment agreement to the XpertHR policies and documents section. The agreement can be used to ensure that both the employee and the employer have an accurate record of the adjustments agreed. It will also minimise the need for adjustments to be renegotiated every time the employee changes job, is relocated or is assigned a new manager.

Where a TUPE transfer involves, or would involve, a “substantial change in working conditions to the material detriment of a person whose contract of employment is or would be transferred”, under reg.4(9) of the TUPE Regulations, the employee may treat the contract as having been terminated and the employee will be treated as having been dismissed. In Tapere v South London and Maudsley NHS Trust, the employee’s place of work changed as a result of a TUPE transfer, and the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) had to consider the correct approach to construing reg.4(9) in this context. It also considered whether or not a mobility clause originally agreed in relation to the geographical area in which the transferor operated could, after the transfer, be interpreted as applying to the geographical area in which the transferee operated.

New XpertHR FAQs include: If an employer dismisses a pregnant employee as redundant is she still entitled to receive maternity pay? and Where a vacancy arises because an employee leaves, but this occurs after an earlier redundancy exercise, is the employer obliged to offer the vacant position to one of the individuals who was made redundant?

XpertHR Joanna Stubbs,
Editor,
Employment Law Bulletin

MORE FOR SUBSCRIBERS
GO TO XPERTHR FOR
Case law reports
Legal timetable
Policies and documents
Line manager briefings
FAQs
GET MORE OUT OF XPERTHR
Today's tip: using the XpertHR legislation service
Forward to a colleague
Read previous newsletters
TOOLS FOR SUBSCRIBERS
Advanced search
Advertise a job with XpertHR
Share benchmarking data
Take the XpertHR tour
Print all articles (Read this first)
ACCESS PROBLEMS
Password reminder
Email the helpdesk
or call 0845 671 1110
Take the XpertHR tour
  NEWS

Government calls for evidence on default retirement age

In advance of the Government's review of the default retirement age in 2010, it is asking interested parties to submit evidence on the workings of the default retirement age.

View Online View article in full Print Article Print article Forward to a colleague Forward to a colleague
Forward to a colleagueTop
  CASENOTES

TUPE

Tapere v South London and Maudsley NHS Trust

The EAT holds that, in requiring a transferred employee to move to a location outside the scope of the mobility clause in her original contract of employment with the transferor, the transferee had acted in fundamental breach of contract. The employee’s subsequent resignation therefore amounted to a constructive dismissal. Further, the transferee’s attempt to move her place of work amounted to a substantial change in her working conditions to her material detriment. She was, therefore, also entitled to be treated as having been dismissed under reg.4(9) of the TUPE Regulations.

View Online View article in full Print Article Print article Forward to a colleague Forward to a colleague

Redundancy

Lomond Motors Ltd v Clark

The EAT holds that an employment tribunal had erred in finding a dismissal unfair on the grounds that the redundancy selection pool had been incorrectly drawn. The tribunal had substituted its own view for that of a reasonable employer. The tribunal had further erred in its assessment of compensation.

View Online View article in full Print Article Print article Forward to a colleague Forward to a colleague

Equal pay

Somerset County Council and another v Pike

The Court of Appeal holds that a pension scheme that excluded part-time work done by employees already in receipt of a pension was potentially discriminatory because it had a disproportionate impact on women. In assessing whether or not there has been indirect discrimination, the relevant pool for comparison must exclude those who have no interest in the effect of the practice under challenge - in this case employees not yet in receipt of their pension.

View Online View article in full Print Article Print article Forward to a colleague Forward to a colleague

RELATED ARTICLES ON XPERTHR

Stop press - up-to-the-minute news on key cases

Forward to a colleagueTop
  MODEL POLICIES AND DOCUMENTS

Tailored reasonable adjustment agreement for an employee with a disability

Use this model form to create a record of reasonable adjustments agreed between a disabled employee and his or her line manager. [full XpertHR subscription required]

View Online View article in full Print Article Print article Forward to a colleague Forward to a colleague

Letter offering a job to an employee who has previously been made redundant from the organisation

Use this model letter when you wish to offer a new position to an employee who has previously been made redundant and has finished working his or her notice period. [full XpertHR subscription required]

View Online View article in full Print Article Print article Forward to a colleague Forward to a colleague

Letter informing employees who were told that their job was at risk of redundancy that it is now safe

Use this model letter when your redundancy consultation and selection procedure has closed to inform employees no longer at risk of redundancy that their job will remain. [full XpertHR subscription required]

View Online View article in full Print Article Print article Forward to a colleague Forward to a colleague

RELATED ARTICLES ON XPERTHR

Line manager briefing on disability discrimination [full XpertHR subscription required]

Forward to a colleagueTop
 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

We provide the answers to the following questions:

Forward to a colleagueTop
 FROM THE BLOG

Launched and run by the editorial team that produces XpertHR and the IRS e-journals, the Employment Intelligence blog is regularly updated with news, comment and links to the latest employment developments.

Here’s a selection of recent posts:

Forward to a colleagueTop
  MORE FROM XPERTHR...

Today's tip: using the XpertHR legislation service

Do you want to check the definition of “night worker” in the Working Time Regulations 1998 or see what s.98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 says? For those occasions when you need to see the actual wording of acts or regulations, XpertHR provides access to the LexisNexis Butterworths legislation service, a regularly updated resource providing the full text of all UK legislation with an impact on employment relations.

Print all articles in this newsletter

This newsletter now has a "print all" button. Before pressing it, please be aware that this uses a lot of paper. For the sake of the planet and your toner cartridge, consider whether or not you need to use it. If you press "print all", this will send to your printer all articles linked from the main column of the newsletter. It will not print blog posts. Print all articles.

Forward to a colleagueTop
Part of the XpertHR Group

Manage your Account

This email has been sent to luke.smith@rbi.co.uk
Add us to your safe senders list to ensure you receive our emails.
Unsubscribe from future Employment Law Bulletin emails

© Reed Business Information Ltd +44 (0)20 8652 3500 | Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy

Disclaimer:
This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) (\"Intended Recipient\") to whom it is addressed. It may contain information, which is privileged and confidential. Accordingly any dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this message or any of its content by any person other than the Intended Recipient may constitute a breach of civil or criminal law and is strictly prohibited. If you are not the Intended Recipient, please contact the sender as soon as possible.
Reed Business Information Limited
Registered Office: Quadrant House, The Quadrant, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5AS
Registered in England under Company No. 0151537